Sidharth Rawat vs Yaojie Zeng Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Oct at 04:58 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Rawat vs Y. Zeng

IND
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Rawat 1 - 0 Zeng
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sidharth Rawat winning 2 and Yaojie Zeng winning 0. The last match between Sidharth Rawat and Yaojie Zeng was at the Shenzhen Challenger, 12-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Sidharth Rawat getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rawat | 1 |
| Zeng | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Shenzhen Challenger(10-12-25)
S. Rawat vs Y. Zeng H2H Profile
S. Rawat vs Y. Zeng Match Preview:
- How does Yaojie Zeng's second serve performance compare to Sidharth Rawat's? Yaojie Zeng holds a slight edge with a 45.99% success rate on second serve points, just above Sidharth Rawat's 45.32% over the past six months.
- Yaojie Zeng appears more proficient in returning second serves, winning 44.56% of these points compared to Sidharth Rawat's 39.56%.
- Interestingly, Sidharth Rawat is stronger in first serve returns than Yaojie Zeng, winning 28.64% against Zeng's 22.92%.
- Under pressure, Yaojie Zeng has performed better, saving 58.42% of breakpoints as opposed to Sidharth Rawat’s 47.47%.
- Overall performance in the past year has been quite close: Yaojie Zeng boasts a 56.86% win rate, narrowly leading Sidharth Rawat's 56.67%.
- Surface preference could play a crucial role: Yaojie Zeng's best career surface is indoor hard courts, while Sidharth Rawat excels on hard courts.
- Both players have played mostly on Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events over the past year, with Zeng's win rate at 60.98% and Rawat's slightly higher at 61.82%.
- What is the quality of opposition each player has faced? Yaojie Zeng’s opponents have averaged a higher rank of 360.47, compared to Sidharth Rawat’s 389.93.
- In matches that go the distance, Yaojie Zeng has the upper hand, winning 71% of deciding sets, compared to Sidharth Rawat’s 59% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (October 12, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match will likely hinge on several key performance metrics that show Yaojie Zeng having a slight advantage. The superior breakpoint saving rate and more effective performance in deciding sets favor Zeng, highlighting their resilience under pressure.
The second serve and return performances also suggest Yaojie Zeng possesses a minor edge. Although Sidharth Rawat demonstrates better first serve returns, Zeng's consistency in second serve situations could be pivotal.
Both players have similar overall win rates and experience levels in the past year, making this a potentially tight contest. However, when considering playing surfaces, opponent quality, and set-deciding performance, Yaojie Zeng appears to have the upper hand.
In conclusion, based on the statistical comparisons and recent form, Yaojie Zeng is predicted to be the likely winner of the forthcoming match.
Sidharth Rawat vs Yaojie Zeng Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Rawat vs Y. Zeng H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:20:23 | Average Match Time | 1:20:23 |
| 50% (23/46) | 1st Serve % | 58% (33/57) |
| 91% (21/23) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (15/33) |
| 61% (14/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (14/24) |
| 100% (4/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (28/57) | Return Points Win % | 24% (11/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Rawat Recent Matches Played
Y. Zeng Recent Matches Played

S. Rawat vs Y. Zeng Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.36% (318/278) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.62% (71/59) |
| 52.51% (711/643) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.68% (157/141) |
| 51.36% (6520/6175) | Games Win/Loss | 51.10% (1485/1421) |
| 54.44% (294/246) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.88% (55/49) |
| 46.00% (23/27) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.11% (11/7) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 1665 | Aces Total | 550 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 686 | Total Double Faults | 301 |
| 1:16:13 | Average Match Time | 1:17:25 |
| 548.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 282.04 |
| 57% (17584/30646) | 1st Serve % | 59% (3476/5908) |
| 68% (12024/17584) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (2467/3476) |
| 52% (6786/13062) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1170/2432) |
| 43% (1350/3162) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (213/500) |
| 40% (12631/31444) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2181/5838) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.08% (56/74) | Challenger W/L | 29.41% (5/12) |
| 56.49% (261/201) | Futures W/L | 58.41% (66/47) |
| 53% (305/580) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (70/129) |
| 100% (5/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (76/163) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (14/33) |
| 50% (85/170) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (22/37) |
| 87% (301/263) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (67/59) |
| 13% (301/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (67/8) |
| 18% (294/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (63/12) |